![pcm vs dolby digital pcm vs dolby digital](https://ae01.alicdn.com/kf/Hab3bcc18690940f69142a677aff9cffb1/MAXAXM-HDMI-Audio-Extractor-Decoder-4K-60Hz-Extract-Optical-Digital-or-Analog-Audio-Output-Support-PCM.jpg)
If I had something like that for DTS vs DVD it would help. My Denon stereo test CD has frequency sweeps and test tones with equal SPL at different frequencies. Posted on Tuesday, J11:37 GMTI have had posts go wrong too.
#Pcm vs dolby digital software#
If you buy an SPL meter, use laptop and this ( ) software to test your system. I haven't tried these but they say they do. Video Essentials doesn't have DTS either. Timn8ter, what tones are you refering to? Anything John plays will only be good for that source unless he can encode a DTS steam.
![pcm vs dolby digital pcm vs dolby digital](https://samplerateconverter.com/sites/default/files/u1/lpcm.png)
Objective reviews in mags like Sound and Vision weren't definative either. I keep hearing that DTS sounds better because they use less compression but I can't realy prove it because I have found that the mixes are different. I simply chalked it up to the mix, get on my knees and turned my sub down. Posted on Sunday, J22:13 GMTJohn, I have heard completely different bass levels between DD and DTS. John Allen This message is posted on both Home Audio, Speakers and Home Theater. I can't find anything about this anywhere, so maybe it's my system, not the recordings.ĭoes anyone else experience a massive difference in sub output between DTS and Dolby Digital? Which component is at fault? I only have one system with one of each component, so I can't experiment. You have to look hard to find a DTS disk for rent or sale. Where I live we get mostly specific region 2 DVDs, and DTS is usually sacrificed for dubbed DD 5.1 channels. By the way, "High Level Description" it is not. Maybe someone takes them at their word, and puts + 10 dB on the LFE signal just to blast the listener? Some of my DVDs sound just like this. And they don't mean "signal in the main channel" they mean "bandwidth" or "capacity". The signal in the LFE channel is calibrated during soundtrack production to be able to contribute 10 dB higher SPL than the same bass signal from any one of the screen (front) channels." Does anyone think this means that the same bass should should be increased 10 dB (more than eight times louder) through the LFE channel than any single channel? That is absurd and cannot be what they mean. One thing it says there is "The LFE channel carries additional bass information to supplement the bass information in the main channels.
![pcm vs dolby digital pcm vs dolby digital](https://www.lifewire.com/thmb/5zmKIsKU1HnRaXXyxeHQrqIlNoY=/2000x1499/filters:no_upscale():max_bytes(150000):strip_icc()/bitstream-binary-5807f60f3df78cbc28b94614-a90cf1c6655b4a29b047234bfcdf9892.jpg)
With the sub "level" control set at 12 o'clock, the sub sounds exactly like a natural and balanced long downward extension of the whole system, in the whole room. I connect the sub to the line-level 0.1 receiver output. I don't think the brand matters here.ĭTS is really great. Watching movies is better for the whole family, and more of a shared experience, an unexpected benefit. Over the last few months I have expanded my stereo system to get 5.1, and it is a great pleasure.